Legal Opinion

Russell v. Kanaga

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 23, 1990PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

This is an appeal from a jury verdict in favor of the defendant-appellee, Margo Ka-naga, M.D. (“Dr. Kanaga”), in a medical malpractice action. In this appeal, the plaintiff-appellants, Shirley F. Russell and James A. Russell (“the Russells”) contend that the Superior Court erred by not allowing the written opinion of a medical malpractice review panel (“the Panel”) to be introduced as evidence. Dr. Kanaga has filed a cross-appeal, in which she asserts that the Superior Court erred in denying her motion for a directed verdict. We have concluded that the Superior Court erred,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Law v. GallegherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  2. Strauss v. BiggsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  3. Lacy v. GreenSuperior Court of Delaware · 1981
  4. Christian v. Wilmington General Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
  5. Peters v. GelbSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Burkhart v. DaviesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  2. Green v. WeinerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  3. Money v. Manville Corp. Asbestos Disease Compensation Trust FundSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  4. CitiSteel USA, Inc. v. CONNELL LIMITED PARTNERSHIPSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  5. John Fritz v. William YeagerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API