Legal Opinion

John Fritz v. William Yeager

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 12, 2002No. 79, 2001PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a Superior Court ruling, during trial, granting judgment in favor of appellee/defendant below William Yeager (“Yeager”) in a personal injury action brought by appellant/plaintiff below John Fritz (“Fritz”). Fritz sought damages for a hand injury that occurred while he was operating Yeager’s table saw, on Yeager’s premises, under a construction contract. After closing arguments but before submission to the jury, the Superior Court granted Yeager’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on the ground that Yeager did not owe a duty to Fritz based on Restatement (Second)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Koutoufaris v. DickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Russell v. KanagaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Heinz v. HeinzSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. Estate of Eller v. BartronSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  3. Spence v. Cherian v. SpenceSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
  4. Storm v. NSL ROCKLAND PLACE, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2005
  5. Pipher v. ParsellSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API