Green v. Weiner
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VEASEY, Chief Justice:
The sole question to be decided in this medical malpractice case is whether a medical expert’s testimony adequately specified the applicable standard of care and a breach of that standard in accordance -with 18 Del.C. § 6853. The Superi- or Court trial judge found that the expert’s testimony was deficient in both respects and granted the defendant doctor’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. We hold that the expert’s proffered testimony provided sufficient evidence of both the standard of care and of the doctor’s breach of that standard to create a genuine issue of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burkhart v. DaviesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Di Filippo v. PrestonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
- Hurtt v. GoleburnSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- Mazda Motor Corp. v. LindahlSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Dishmon v. FucciSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Bonesmo v. Nemours FoundationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- Estate of Rae v. MurphySupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Daddio v. A.I. DuPont Hospital for Children of the Nemours FoundationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Kardos v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.