Legal Opinion
Conrad v. Jones
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided October 6, 1976No. 7628SC320PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Plaintiffs contend the court erred in not determining who had title to the eight-inch sewer line. They base their contention upon the court’s failure to make any finding or conclusion as to what interest, if any, they have in the sewer line, and the court’s following announcement:
“[I]t was not necessary for the Court to decide the question of title to the sewer line built by Southeastern in order to resolve this case. That without deciding the question of title with respect to the sewer line, the one built by Southeastern, but assuming that the plaintiff is the owner of it, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCormick v. . ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Peoples v. PeoplesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Dunn v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Lawing v. JaynesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Lawing v. JaynesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- English v. Holden Beach Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Bishop v. ReinholdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Kugler v. RyanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Young v. LicaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Williams v. South & South Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.