Legal Opinion

Lawing v. Jaynes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 1, 1974No. 79PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOBBITT, Chief Justice.

In the agreement of 9 March 1964 defendants Jaynes granted to plaintiffs an option to purchase the real property at a purchase price to be computed on the basis of $500.00 per acre, or fractional part thereof, as determined by a surveyor acceptable to both parties, and the additional sum of $9,000.00 for the dwelling. The agreement provided: “This option shall exist and continue for a period of Two Calendar Years from the 1st day of March, 1964, but no longer.”

In their agreement of 9 March 1964, defendants Jaynes also granted to plaintiffs an option to purchase the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Trogden v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. King v. . McRackanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Insurance Co. v. . KnoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Whitehurst v. AbbottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Morris v. . BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Variety Wholesalers, Inc. v. Salem Logistics Traffic Services, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Hill v. Pinelawn Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. BurtonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1984
  5. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. v. SchlossbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API