Kaplenski v. Horwitz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
The finding states the following facts: On December 24th, 1930, the plaintiff purchased of Stanley Rybczyk a Hupmobile sedan for $1239.80, which he paid by assuming and paying a balance of $439.80 due on the automobile to a finance company, by canceling Rybczyk’s note of $600 in his favor, and by assuming and paying a balance of $200 on a note of Rybczyk and his wife at the bank. Prior to the sale Rybczyk had kept the car in a garage in the rear of his house, and after the sale and until February 1st, 1931, it remained there when not in use, but the plaintiff paid Rybczyk’s wife $1 a week for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shea v. CorbettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Norton v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1865
- Freedman v. AverySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Seymour v. O'KeefeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
- Dann v. LukeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Burakowski v. GrustasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Lockwood v. HelfantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Budris v. Allstate InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Cleeland v. CarterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Krappatsch v. ThompsonConnecticut Superior Court · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.