Legal Opinion

Kaplenski v. Horwitz

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 15, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

The finding states the following facts: On December 24th, 1930, the plaintiff purchased of Stanley Rybczyk a Hupmobile sedan for $1239.80, which he paid by assuming and paying a balance of $439.80 due on the automobile to a finance company, by canceling Rybczyk’s note of $600 in his favor, and by assuming and paying a balance of $200 on a note of Rybczyk and his wife at the bank. Prior to the sale Rybczyk had kept the car in a garage in the rear of his house, and after the sale and until February 1st, 1931, it remained there when not in use, but the plaintiff paid Rybczyk’s wife $1 a week for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shea v. CorbettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  2. Norton v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1865
  3. Freedman v. AverySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  4. Seymour v. O'KeefeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  5. Dann v. LukeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burakowski v. GrustasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  2. Lockwood v. HelfantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  3. Budris v. Allstate InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. Cleeland v. CarterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  5. Krappatsch v. ThompsonConnecticut Superior Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API