Dann v. Luke
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action of replevin, brought to the City Court of Danbury and tried to the court, Scott, J. ; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff, and appeal by the defendants for alleged errors in the rulings of the court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
The record in this case shows that the wagons in question, when replevied on the 7th of December, 1900, were held by an officer, the defendant Luke, under an attachment made by him on the 4th of said December, in an action by the defendant White against one Osborne. From September, 1898, until September 15th, 1899, Osborne had owned and used the wagons as a part of the stock of the livery business owned by him in Danbury, and conducted by him under the sign “ Crosby Street Stables, Harvey Osborne, Proprietor.”
On the 15th of September, 1899, in good faith, and for an adequate consideration,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. SkearySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
- Bird v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
3Cited by3 opinions
- Freedman v. AverySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Kaplenski v. HorwitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Cleeland v. CarterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940