Legal Opinion
Copeland v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 30, 1997No. 96 C 1270PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Before the court are numerous motions by the parties in this ease. Defendants Northwestern Memorial Hospital, the City of Chicago, Abel Pena, and Lee Harbaugh have brought motions to dismiss plaintiff Clyde Copeland’s complaint. Plaintiff Clyde Copeland has brought motions related to various discovery requests, for production of transcripts, for issuance of a subpoena, to substitute parties of interest, and for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the court grants defendants’ motions to dismiss, and strikes some and denies some of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hernandez v. DartDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Kennington v. CarterDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2002
- Benson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Ruppel v. RamseyerDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1999
- Aniniba v. City of AuroraDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.