Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Dart

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 10, 2009No. 09 C 661PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MARVIN E. ASPEN, District Judge.

Presently before us is Plaintiff Jaime Hernandez’s application to proceed in for-ma pauperis (IFP) and for appointment of counsel 1 in his multi-count complaint against Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart and various named Cook County Sheriff Deputies (“Defendant Deputies”), former Cook County State’s Attorney Dick Devine and Assistant Cook County State’s Attorneys Andrea Kirsten and Sara Karr (“State’s Attorney Defendants”), Attorneys David Wessel and Russell Stewart, and Cook County Circuit Judges Maria Kuriakos-Ciesil 2 and Thomas More…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. O'Connell v. Penson Financial Services, Inc. (In re Arbco Capital Management, LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Bhatia v. VaswaniDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. Bland v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  4. Cooper v. WesnerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2025
  5. Demetrius Cooper v. Dr. Kerry Kuffenkam et al.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API