Legal Opinion
Aniniba v. City of Aurora
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 26, 1998No. 1:96-cv-01195PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MILLER, District Judge.
Before me are defendants’ motions for summary judgment. 1 After considering the briefs filed by the parties and counsels’ argument at a hearing on the motions, I conclude that plaintiff has failed to establish a constitutional violation to support his civil rights claims and that the defendants are entitled to immunity with regard to his state law tort claims. Therefore, I grant the motions for summary judgment and dismiss plaintiffs complaint.
Factual Background
The catalyst for this action is an incident that occurred during the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Merritt v. HawkDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2001
- Henson v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2013
- Farris v. SteppDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- Frederickson v. Larimer CountyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023