Legal Opinion
Littlefield-Alger Signal Co. v. County of Nassau
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 19, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.
Littlefield-Alger Signal Go., Inc., applies for a judgment, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, directing the County of Nassau to issue to the Baldwin Fire District or to Littlefield-Alger a permit for the installation of a fire pre-emption system on a Nassau County road. The Baldwin Fire District was the applicant to the county for the permit, not Littlefield-Alger. The county denied that application, and by letter dated May 27, 1963 to the Baldwin Fire District, stated that it could not approve any such permit since the application called for Littlefield-Alger to be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Walsh v. LaguardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Matter of Pruzan v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Wire, Inc. v. BruckmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Kenny Development Corp. v. KramerNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Niagara Frontier Co-Operative Milk Producers Bargaining Agency, Inc. v. Du MondNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wood v. LussierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
- Morgenthau v. GoldNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Davis v. StarrNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Poughkeepsie v. DiamondNew York Supreme Court · 1973