Legal Opinion

Matter of Pruzan v. Valentine

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1940PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

In this proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act we have granted leave to appeal and now review an order of the Appellate Division unanimously affirming an order of Special Term denying the appellant’s application for an order directing the respondents to approve his application for licenses to operate two taxicabs in the city of New York. The appellant asserts that the respondents’ action in denying his application was capricious, arbitrary and unreasonable.

Having chosen to apply at Special Term for an order to compel the performance of an alleged official duty, the appellant is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Elite Dairy Products v. Ten EyckNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Matter of Durr v. Paragon Trading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Matter of Coombs v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Matter of Stracquadanio v. Dept. of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Ass'n of Surrogates v. BartlettNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Usen v. SipprellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. Hempstead T-W Corp. v. Town of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Sperling v. ValentineNew York Supreme Court · 1941

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API