Legal Opinion
Morgenthau v. Gold
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 2, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard W. Wallach, J.
Motion and cross motions Nos. 106 and 120, argued and submitted on the Special Term Part 1 Calendar of October 26, 1984, are consolidated and disposed of as follows:(1) Application by Robert M. Morgenthau as District Attorney of New York County for a judgment pursuant to CPLR article 78 compelling Honorable Jay Gold, a Judge of the Criminal Court *857of the City of New York, and his successor Judge presiding in All Purpose Part 3 (Honorable Stanley Gartenstein) to restore approximately 17 criminal prosecutions to the Active Calendar of that tribunal is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Klostermann v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. DouglassNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Riglander v. Star Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morgenthau v. GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. JonesCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1984
- Tracey Tower Realty Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1986