Legal Opinion

Halliburton-Arbott Co. v. Hodge

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 2, 1935No. 25191PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

The plaintiff, Daisy Hodge, sued the Halliburton-Abbott Company, a corporation operating a department store in Tulsa,- to recover damages on account of false imprisonment. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $1,000 actual damages and $3,000 exemplary damages. Upon consideration of defendant’s motion for new trial, the court ordered that a new trial should be had unless plaintiff should remit half of 'the punitive damages, whereupon plaintiff filed her remittitur of $1,-500. Judgment was then rendered for $1,-000 actual damages and $1,500 punitive damages, motion for new trial was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. W. T. Grant Co. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
  2. Clinchfield Coal Corp. v. ReddSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. RadfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Dillon v. Sears-Roebuck Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Dixon v. Helena Society of Free Methodist ChurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fifth Club, Inc. v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Noble v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Munsell v. Ideal Food StoresSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  4. Hendricks v. Leslie Fay, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Dupree v. Piggly Wiggly Shop Rite Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API