Halliburton-Arbott Co. v. Hodge
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
The plaintiff, Daisy Hodge, sued the Halliburton-Abbott Company, a corporation operating a department store in Tulsa,- to recover damages on account of false imprisonment. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $1,000 actual damages and $3,000 exemplary damages. Upon consideration of defendant’s motion for new trial, the court ordered that a new trial should be had unless plaintiff should remit half of 'the punitive damages, whereupon plaintiff filed her remittitur of $1,-500. Judgment was then rendered for $1,-000 actual damages and $1,500 punitive damages, motion for new trial was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- W. T. Grant Co. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
- Clinchfield Coal Corp. v. ReddSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. RadfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Dillon v. Sears-Roebuck Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Dixon v. Helena Society of Free Methodist ChurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
3Cited by23 opinions
- Fifth Club, Inc. v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Noble v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Munsell v. Ideal Food StoresSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Hendricks v. Leslie Fay, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Dupree v. Piggly Wiggly Shop Rite Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.