Legal Opinion
Connecticut National Bank v. Investors Capital Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 8, 1992No. 10973PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
The defendants appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff for $359,484.84. The defendants claim that the trial court abused its discretion (1) by entering a default against them for their failure to comply with a court order to disclose assets, and (2) by denying their motion to set aside the default. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The essential facts pertinent to this appeal are not substantially in dispute. During 1988 and 1989, the plaintiff made three separate $100,000 loans to the defendant Investors Capital Corporation (Investors). The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jaconski v. AMF, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Town of Voluntown v. RytmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Rullo v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Fox v. First BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Weldon Business Group v. SchweitzerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bunche v. BuncheConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Puris v. PurisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Allstate Insurance v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Dubreuil v. WittConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Connecticut National Bank v. Investors Capital Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.