Legal Opinion

State v. Perez-Diaz, 06ca0130 (6-6-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 2008No. 06CA0130PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} As a result of engaging in sexual activity with his girlfriend's eleven year old sister, Defendant was indicted on one count of rape, R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b), and two counts of gross sexual imposition, R.C. 2907.05(A)(4). Defendant filed a motion to suppress incriminating statements he made during a phone call with the victim's sister which police recorded.

Defendant argued that without a warrant the interception of that phone call by police violated Ohio's wiretapping statute, R.C. 2933.52. Following a hearing, the trial court overruled Defendant's motion to suppress his statements…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. State v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. City of Huber Heights v. DutyOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State v. Hanneman, 21772 (9-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Shelton, 22202 (8-8-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. CoomesOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API