Legal Opinion

State v. Hanneman, 21772 (9-28-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 2007No. 21772PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant, William H.L. Hanneman, entered a guilty plea to a charge of complicity to commit aggravated robbery. R.C. 2923.03(A)(2),2911.01(A)(1). The trial court accepted Defendant's guilty plea pursuant to Crim.R. 11(C), and subsequently entered its judgment of conviction and sentence pursuant to Crim.R. 32(A) and (C), imposing a three year term of imprisonment. Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal.

{¶ 2} Defendant presents two assignments of error for our review. Both involve a motion Defendant filed prior to trial, pursuant to Crim.R. 12(C). One was a motion to dismiss the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. City of Huber Heights v. DutyOhio Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MilesOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. State v. Frost, 06ca0083 (4-18-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. Perez-Diaz, 06ca0130 (6-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API