Janjua v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
J. HARVEY HUDSON, Justice.
Appellant, Atif Janjua, was convicted of promoting child pornography upon his plea of guilty. See Tex. Penal Code § 43.26. 1 After appellant’s conviction, the State moved to forfeit and destroy certain criminal instruments and obscene devices that had been seized from appellant, namely, a Packard Bell central processing unit, a Gold Star color monitor, a Packard Bell keyboard, two video cassette tapes, twenty 3]é inch diskettes, and two 5)4 inch diskettes. In four points of error, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the court’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Roark v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Vincent v. West Texas State University, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
- Milliken v. SmootTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- State v. RumfoloTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Butler v. DexterSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hardy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
- Ariel Medina v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
- Danzi, Joshua Van v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
- Juan Jose Guerra v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2013
- 2,174 Obscene Devices v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.