Legal Opinion
Milliken v. Smoot
Texas Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1885No. Case No. 5279PublishedCited by 52 opinions
Error from Parker. Tried below before the Hon. A. J. Hood. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
A general statement of this case is thus correctly made by the appellant:
“ T. S. Smoot sued Frank Milliken in the Parker district court for the recovery of the horses in controversy as the separate property of his wife, Mrs. M. J. Smoot. She claims the horses under a conveyance from her son, R. T. Smoot.
“ The sheriff of Parker county, Texas, sold the horses under two executions against R. T. Smoot, one in favor of Jo. H. Brown, the other in favor of O. H. Milliken, cashier of the First National Bank of Weatherford. Both executions had been levied on the horses as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hatchett v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1867
- Hutchins v. BaconTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- James v. TankersleyTexas Supreme Court · 1854
- Holloway v. HollowayTexas Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by52 opinions
- Morrow v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1933
- Adleson v. B. F. Dittmar Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Starr v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Jennings v. Texas Farm Mortgage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Yeary v. HinojosaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.