Legal Opinion
Hardy v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided June 27, 2001No. 10-99-336-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Chief Justice.
The State sought to forfeit twenty “eight-liner” machines, four slot machines, and other evidence seized in the course of a gambling investigation. After a show-cause hearing, the court found that the seized evidence constitutes gambling devices, gambling paraphernalia, or gambling proceeds and ordered that this evidence be forfeited to the State. Milton Wayne Hardy and Lovell Green Hardy, individually and doing business as Game Time Amusements, (collectively, the “Hardys”) claim in six issues that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ortiz v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Croucher v. CroucherTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- University of Texas Medical School at Houston v. ThanTexas Supreme Court · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hardy v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Byrd v. Estate of Nelms, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
- One Ford Mustang, VIN 1FAFP40471F207859 v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
- TWENTY-NINE (29) GAMBLING DEVICES v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
- Texas v. Ysleta Del Sur PuebloDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.