Legal Opinion
Harman v. La Crosse Tribune
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided January 18, 1984No. 82-2279PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.
Harman was a shareholder and employee of the firm of Johns, Flaherty, Harman and Gillette, S.C. On March 25, 1975, the shareholders of Har-man’s law firm voted to terminate his employment. Harman brought an action against the shareholders and the La Crosse Tribune, its editor, and its publisher, claiming the Tribune had wrongfully interfered with his employment. He also claimed the discharge violated his rights to free speech and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The trial court granted summary j udgment for defendants. We affirm.
Harman was also a member of the La Crosse…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Brockmeyer v. Dun & BradstreetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. FPC Securities Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Lecus v. American Mutual Insurance Co. of BostonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Lorenz v. DreskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. SokolowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Terri Aleta Rivera v. Woodward Resource Center and State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Dorr v. Sacred Heart HospitalCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- Hale v. Stoughton Hospital Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- Sauer v. Reliance Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.