Legal Opinion

Sauer v. Reliance Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 6, 1989No. 88-2407PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

This is an action for wrongful death brought by the estate of Randal Sauer and other claimants (the estate). Randal drowned in the waters of the East Twin River in Manitowoc county. The principal issue on this appeal is whether the state of Wisconsin is the "owner" of the river bed within the meaning of the "recreational immunity" statute, sec. 895.52, Stats. The trial court ruled on a motion to dismiss that the state was not an "owner" under the statute, thereby precluding application of the statute's immunity protection to the individual appellants, all of whom are state employees of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Illinois Steel Co. v. BilotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Radlein v. Industrial Fire & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. McCaffrey v. ShanksCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  5. State v. TrudeauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Linville v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Reyes v. Greatway Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Brandt v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  5. Sievert v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API