Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Roney

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 9, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The sole question here presented relates to the amount of the commissions to which the executors are entitled. The facts pertinent to a decision have been stipulated. On principal account, they received property and securities, the value of which for commission purposes is stipulated to have been $79,673.97, and also 100 shares of Bethlehem Steel Company stock and 220 shares of International Harvester stock. The two last-named items, at the time of their receipt by the executors, had a value of $36,530. On July 29, 1930, they were delivered and accepted in kind by the residuary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of WilletsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. In re the Estate of GrossmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1915
  3. Casey v. LeslieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. In re the Estate of FrothinghamNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of EbbetsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of KennedyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. In re the Estate of CullenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1985
  4. In re the Accounting of RobertsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API