Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Frothingham

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 15, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The sole question raised i tims accounting concerns that perenially perplexing problem of thfe proportion of stock dividends properly payable to a life tenant and the amount thereof which should be allocated to the corpus of the trust and thus pass to the remainder interests.

The legal principles involved in such questions are few and easily understood, the sole difficulty being in their concrete application.

Unquestionably the two leading cases on the subject are Matter of Osborne (209 N. Y. 450) and Bourne v. Bourne (240 id. 172).

The latter decision contains several paragraphs, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of OsborneNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Sturgis v. RocheNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Sturgis v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MartNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  2. In re the Estate of OlcottNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  3. In re the Estate of RoneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API