In re the Estate of Kennedy
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The present application to compel the filing of a bond by an executrix who has qualified and has for some time been acting under a will expressly stipulating that no security be required of her, runs counter to the familiar principle that “ the courts will not undertake to make a better will nor name a better executor for the testator.” (Matter of Leland, 219 N. Y. 387, 393.) As is said in Matter of Bergdorf (206 N. Y. 309, 312): “ The intent of a testator as to how, when and by whom his estate shall be conserved, paid out and distributed will be, if needs be, strenuously searched…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re the Several Accountings of the Executors of TildenNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- In Re Proving the Will of BergdorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- In Re Proving the Will of LelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Hartnett v. . WandellNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- In re the Estate of WalshNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re the Estate of CurleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- In re the Estate of DraskeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Estate of JadwinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1969
- In re the Estate of ClarkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of ZalewskiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.