Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Grossman

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 15, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Proceeding upon the judicial settlement of the account of trustees.

1Opinion of the Court

Fowler, S.

Upon the judicial settlement of this account of the two trustees under the last will and testament of the above-named deceased, a question as to the right of each trustee to full commissions is presented by reason of the fact that the principal accounted for amounts to $84,578.78 and the income accounted for amounts to $136,106.34. The accountants claim that they are each entitled to full commissions, but this does not appear to be correct. Prior to September 1, 1914, trustees’ commissions upon accountings in this court were allowed in ■accordance with the provisions of section…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of WilletsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Chisolm v. HamersleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Intermediate Judicial Settlement of the Account of KeaneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916
  2. In re the Estate of SearsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of FreemanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1918
  4. In re the Estate of RoneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API