Legal Opinion
North Carolina Board of Pharmacy v. Lane
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided April 9, 1958No. 172PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The agreed facts, on which the case was submitted, constitute the sole basis for decision. Eason v. Dew, 244 N.C. 571, 94 S.E. 2d 603; Edwards v. Raleigh, 240 N.C. 137, 81 S.E. 2d 273; Greensboro v. Wall, 247 N.C. 516, 522, 101 S.E. 2d 413. Do these facts support the court’s conclusions of law and judgment?
• Statutory provisions regulating the practice of pharmacy in North Carolina comprise GS Ch. 90, Art. 4.
“Where the practice of a profession or calling requires special knowledge or skill and intimately affects the public health, morals, order, or safety, or the general welfare, the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- State v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. . BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Allopathic State Board of Medical Examiners v. FowlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
- City of Greensboro v. WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- State v. HovorkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Ahoskie Production Credit Association v. WhedbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Loblaw, Inc. v. New York State Board of PharmacyNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Town of Winterville v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.