State v. White
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
The principles governing the interpretation of statutes challenged as unconstitutional are well established. There is a presumption in favor of constitutionality. State v. Hales, 256 N.C. 27, 122 S.E. 2d 768 (1961). When the constitutionality of a statute is challenged, every presumption will be indulged in favor of its validity. State v. Matthews, 270 N.C. 35, 153 S.E. 2d 791 (1967). The unconstitutionality of the statute must appear clearly. State v. Anderson, 275 N.C. 168, 166 S.E. 2d 49 (1969). If the statute is susceptible of two interpretations, one constitutional and the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Witt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Whittington v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Carolina Truck & Body Co., Inc. v. Gen. Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.