Legal Opinion

Boyer v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1930No. 22019. En BancPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

This is an action for damages claimed to have been suffered by appellants by reason of the fact that the main sewer to which their property was connectéd became clogged or overtaxed causing the sewage to be deposited upon their property. The facts are as follows:

Appellants are the owners of certain premises on South Park avenue in Tacoma. In 1927 they built a new house on these premises with a basement seven and a half feet deep. By means of a connection run from their basement, they were joined to the sewer running through an alley some sixty feet distant from their house, there being a drop…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Seifert v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Ashley v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Weis v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Brayton v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. O'Brien v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Pruitt v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Laurelon Terrace, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Pruitt v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Tombari v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API