Legal Opinion

Tombari v. City of Spokane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1938No. 27256. Department TwoPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This action was brought to recover for damages alleged to have been sustained as a result of the depositing of sewage and water into plaintiff’s basement from a public sewer. The cause was tried to the court, which found that, pursuant to ordinance and regulations of defendant, plaintiff connected his property to appellant’s sewer; that the sewer installation required and approved by defendant was improper; that the sewer was of insufficient capacity to carry off the sewage and water conducted into it; and that, as the proximate result of defendant’s negligence, plaintiff sustained damage in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vittucci Importing Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Boyer v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Woolworth Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kleinclaus v. Marin Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Pruitt v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Laurelon Terrace, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Pruitt v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Barney's Furniture Warehouse of Newark, Inc. v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API