Legal Opinion

Pruitt v. Douglas County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 17, 2003No. 21055-3-IIIPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

This is a suit by homeowners Sam and Boni Fletcher and John and Marian Pruitt against Douglas County for water damage arising from a June 1997 storm. Originally, the natural flow of water across certain land— *551properties ultimately acquired by the homeowners here— would have been 15 cubic feet per second (c.f.s.) during a similar storm. But before the landowners built their homes, the county and others constructed roads which reduced the natural flow across their properties from such a storm to 1 to 2 c.f.s. After the homeowners built, the county made road improvements which channeled water…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Wilson Court Ltd. Partnership v. Tony Maroni's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Orion Corporation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1987

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  2. Hurley v. Port Blakely Tree Farms LPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. DeNardo v. CorneloupAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Markam Group, Inc. v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Showalter v. City of CheneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API