Serrano v. Cudahy Packing Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District Court.- — W. G. Sears, Judge. Aotion to recover compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Iowa instituted on behalf of the parents of the deceased who are residents of Mexico. The industrial commissioner denied the relief and on appeal to the district court his decision was affirmed. Claimants appeal. —
1Opinion of the CourtDe G-RAEe, J.
1. Master and servant : Workmen’s Compensation Act: finding on conflicting testimony. It was stipulated upon tlie original Rearing that Manuel Serrano entered the employ of the defendant company about the 24th day of November, 1919, and that on the 4th day of February 1920 he received an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment which resulted in his death. The claimants are his father and mother who are and always have been alien residents.
This appeal presents but one question, to wit: Has the dependency of the claimants been established by a preponderance of the evidence?…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blanton v. Wheeler & Howes Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- McDonald v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Rock Island Bridge & Iron Works v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Miller v. GardnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- MacDonald v. Pocahontas Coal & Fuel Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kyle v. Greene High SchoolSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Davis v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Ash v. Modern Sand & Gravel Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1938
- Smith v. Soldiers' & Sailors' Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Ferriter's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.