Legal Opinion

Ferriter's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 27, 1929PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

This is a proceeding under the workmen’s compensation act. G. L. c. 152. The claimant, James J. Ferriter, is the son of James T. Ferriter, the employee, who received an injury on August 14, 1928, in the course of his employment, from which he died. The sole question for determination is whether at the time of the injury the claimant was dependent upon his father within the meaning of the statute and therefore entitled to compensation thereunder. The Industrial Accident Board found “as a fact that there was not a condition of dependency in this case.” In the Superior Court a decree was entered…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Boyle v. Columbian Fire Proofing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  2. Derinza's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Herrick's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Bortle v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Ebert v. HaskellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Di Clavio's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Roney's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Meyler v. Mayor and City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  4. Ricks v. H. K. Porter, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  5. Panesis v. Loyal Protective Life InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API