Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Pocahontas Coal & Fuel Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 15, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On appeal by defendant from the decision of the chairman of the Industrial Accident Commission, confirmed by a sitting Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court in accordance with the provisions of R. S., Chap. 50, commonly known as the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The case is fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.

This is an appeal from the decision of the chairman of the Industrial Accident Commission confirmed by a sitting Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court in accordance with the .provisions of R. S., Chap. 50, by which decision, compensation at the rate of $9.60 per week for a period of three hundred weeks was awarded the claimant for the death of his minor son, Walter MacDonald.

Walter was injured in the course of his employment on February 24, 1920 and died as a result of his injuries on March 8th, following.

It may be well in view of the issues raised in this case, to briefly review the method…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bortle v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Gherardi v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
  3. Murphy's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Kanton v. KellyWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roberts v. American Chain & Cable Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
  2. Delano v. City of South PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Serrano v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Morrill v. Charles Bianchi & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1935
  5. Kilpinen's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API