Legal Opinion

Koenig v. City of South Haven

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1999No. 109555, Calendar No. 10PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This matter arises out of the near-drowning of plaintiffs’ daughter when a large wave swept her off a pier in the city of South Haven. Plaintiffs pursued a breach of contract claim against the city under a third-party beneficiary theory. They contended that South Haven breached its obligations under a memorandum of understanding with the Army Corps of Engineers to restrict access to the piers in inclement weather. We conclude that plain*670tiffs’ daughter was not an intended third-party beneficiary of the memorandum of understanding. Accordingly, we would reverse the Court of Appeals decision…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Kammer Asphalt Paving Co. v. East China Township SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Rookledge v. GarwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Beaudrie v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Shay v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. CunninghamMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Schmalfeldt v. North Pointe InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Rymal v. BaergenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API