Security Commercial & Savings Bank v. Seitz
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the payment of a promissory note for ten thousand dollars executed by the' defendants, A. F. Mack and Wm. Seitz, Jr., and to enforce the payment of a written guaranty for the payment of said note subsequently executed by the defendant, Wm. Seitz, Sr. The note was executed and delivered to the Blochman Banking Company, a eo partnership consisting of L. A. Blochman and J. A. Heap. This bank was subsequently incorporated under the name of Blochman Commercial & Savings Bank, and thereafter the name was changed by a decree of court to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Truett v. OnderdonkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Del Campo v. CamarilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Montgomery v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
3Cited by7 opinions
- Squire's Department Store, Inc. v. DudumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Johnson v. EhrgottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Newcomb v. Title Guarante & Trust CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Reilly v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Schafer v. Wholesale Frozen Foods, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.