Montgomery v. Peterson
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County and from an order denying a new trial. George H. Cabaniss, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This action is to set aside two deeds on the ground of alleged fraud. The appeal is by the corporation defendant, Tucker Farming Company, and is from the judgment directing it to execute deeds to the plaintiffs and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
The real property in question consists of an undivided two-fifths of the remainder in fee of a tract of approximately ninety-five acres, valued at two hundred dollars an acre, situated in Monterey County. On August 4, 1898, the owner of the property at that time, by deed duly recorded on that date, conveyed a life estate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Murphy v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Truett v. OnderdonkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Del Campo v. CamarilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Prentiss v. McWhirterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Johnson v. WareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Lewis v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Security Commercial & Savings Bank v. SeitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Denson v. PresseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.