Legal Opinion

State v. Dale

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1940PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

We first take up the motion to quash the bill of indictment, or to compel the State to elect upon which one of the crimes supposedly charged therein it would seek conviction.

The first objection to the indictment upon the score that it charges a misdemeanor, and prosecution on that charge is barred by the statute of limitations, has been withdrawn in deference to S. v. Ritter, 199 N. C., 116, 154 S. E., 62, in which the Court holds conspiracy to be a felony. See, also, S. v. Lea, 203 N. C., 13, 164 S. E., 737.

The second ground — that the alleged conspiracy merges, as a matter of law, into the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Heike v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. State v. . KnottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. CroninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. CareySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API