Legal Opinion

The Tuladi

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided March 28, 1927No. 16374PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNS, District Judge.

Libelant seeks damages, for loss occasioned by a decline in the market value of coffee during a delay in' *628shipment, against the American steamship Tuladi and the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, as owner, under a contract of affreightment, dated May 31, 1920, by which the Mississippi Shipping Company, Incorporated, an operating agent of the said owner, acknowledged the receipt of 2,000 bags of coffee in bills of lading issued therefor, stipulating shipment from Victoria, Brazil, by the steamship Tuladi, or other steamer or steamers, to New…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The SaturnusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  2. Galban Lobo & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
  3. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Pensacola Lumber & Timber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
  4. The Olga S.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Celio v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. American Mills Co. v. Luckenbach S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1927
  3. Ortega & Emigh, Inc. v. Grace Line, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1947
  4. (PC) Joseph v. RahimifarDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (PS) Williams v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API