Legal Opinion

(PS) Williams v. Bank of America

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 6, 2021No. 2:21-cv-01141Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DERRICK WILLIAMS, No. 2:21–cv–1141–JAM–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IFP REQUEST; FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO 13 v. DISMISS 14 BANK OF AMERICA, et al., (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel in this action, requested leave to proceed in 18 forma pauperis (“IFP”).1 See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(authorizing the commencement of an action 19 “without prepayment of fees or security” by a person unable to pay such fees). Plaintiff’s 20 affidavit makes the required…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API