Legal Opinion

Ortega & Emigh, Inc. v. Grace Line, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 20, 1947No. 24218PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, District Judge.

Libelant, Ortega & Emigh, Inc., the asserted holder for value of an alleged contradictory bill of lading seeks to recover the sum of $6265.35, its acceptance loss from respondents Grace Line, Inc., and the United States of America.

Prior to trial a stipulation was entered into by the parties:

“Ortega & Emigh, Inc., libelant herein, was during April, May and June, 1943, and still is a California corporation engaged in the importation of coffee.
“In April, 1943, libelant contracted with Salvador Herrera & Co. of Guatemala City, Guatemala, for the purchase of 775 bags coffee,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pollard v. VintonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Olivier Straw Goods Corporation v. Osaka Shosen KaishaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. The TuladiDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1927
  4. The GutenfelsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1908
  5. Leon Israel & Bros. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Caribbean Produce Exchange, Inc. v. Sea Land Service, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1976
  2. Standard Brands, Inc. v. RadjaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API