Legal Opinion
MCINTOSH v. WATKINS
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 26, 2019No. 117,413PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶1 On October 29, 2017, the defendant/appellee, Jake Watkins, was driving under the influence of alcohol and rear-ended a vehicle owned and operated by the plaintiff/appellant, Lee McIntosh. Mr. McIntosh's vehicle was damaged and he and the former co-plaintiff, Anthony McIntosh, were injured. 1 Both vehicles pulled over to the shoulder of the road and the parties exited their vehicles to discuss the accident and to inspect the damage. At some point Mr. McIntosh stated he needed to call the police to report the accident. When Mr. Watkins heard this he returned to…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Federal Bureau of Investigation v. AbramsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- THURSTON v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSUR. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- JOHNSON v. CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE CO. v. POPESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
- PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE CO. v. POPESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
- HARRISON v. OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEMSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.