Legal Opinion

Piloff v. Lipson

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

This is another application for an order quashing subpoenas issued by Milton Lipson, Commissioner of Accounts.

At the oral argument, before the petitioner submitted his brief, his attorney stated that he would demonstrate a legal distinction between this case and my prior Gilmartin decision (Matter of Gilmartin v. Lipson, 34 Misc 2d 998). No discernible distinction has been made. The petitioner in the Gilmartin case was not a public official, but a private citizen, and he too was held obligated to answer to the subpoena issued by the Commissioner of Accounts. So, if the present petitioner,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. In re HertleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Heit & Weisenthal, Inc. v. Gustave LightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Gilmartin v. LipsonNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Bonanno v. RyanNew York Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Piloff v. LipsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API