Legal Opinion

Bonanno v. Ryan

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris E. Spector, J.

Motion to quash a subpoena is denied. Petitioner is required to appear even in those cases where he need not answer incriminating questions. The privilege, when such exists, may only be claimed at the time the questions are propounded (United Ind. Syndicate v. Weismann, 2 A D 2d 663). Even if the petitioner’s contention were correct that a witness may not be compelled to appear for an examination at which no questions would be asked that would not incriminate him (see People’s Coat, Apron & Towel Supply v. Light, 168 App. Div. 142), nevertheless the Commission of Investigation is empowered to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Knapp v. SchweitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Mills v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. People's Coat, Apron & Towel Supply v. LightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gilmartin v. LipsonNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. A, B, C, D, E, F, H, I, J, K, L v. CurranNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. SlochowskyNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Piloff v. LipsonNew York Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API