Heit & Weisenthal, Inc. v. Gustave Light
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
This court has consistently held that the claim that an examination before trial ought not to be had because it might result in compelling the witness to give evidence against himself, is not a proper ground for denying the examination. The right to refuse to incriminate oneself is a personal right and must be claimed at the time the questions are asked. (Nichoff v. Star Co., 134 App. Div. 473; Bioren v. Canadian Mines Co., 140 id. 523; Peterson v. Fowler, 143 id. 282; Ryan v. Reagan, 46 id. 590.) The orders appealed from should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Niehoff v. Star Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hudson Tire Mart, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Gilmartin v. LipsonNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- King v. LiottiNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- Radin v. KornreichNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Tobias v. North American Importing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.