Legal Opinion

Piloff v. Lipson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 27, 1964Published

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding to vacate a subpoena and three subpoenas duces tecum, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 3, 1964, as: (a) denied his application *927to quash the subpoenas duces tecum insofar as they required him to produce his “ Federal and State income tax returns, examinations by tax authorities and reports thereon,” and (b) directed him to produce such documents. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. The said documents shall be produced by petitioner on 10 days’ written notice or on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Piloff v. LipsonNew York Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API