Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Durfee

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1930No. 4947Published

1DissentStraup, J.

The evidence as to the charged lesser offense, that the defendant had possession of moonshine whisky, is in conflict. I, however, concur in the holding that there is sufficient evidence to support the charge. My dissent goes to other questions.

A violation of the liquor laws of our state is a misdemeanor. If a person having once been convicted of such a violation and thereafter again violates any provision of such laws, he is considered a persistent violator and guilty of a felony. Thus, to properly charge an offense of felony under the liquor laws requires a charge of violation or commission…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. State v. TophamUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Stockyards Nat. Bank of South Omaha v. BraggUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  4. State v. FergusonUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State v. BrunoUtah Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API