Legal Opinion

State v. Leek

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1934No. 5047PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

The defendant, Maurie Leek, was charged by the information in two counts with the crime of forgery. The case comes to this court on appeal from a judgment of guilty and sentence based upon a jury’s verdict after trial in the district court of the Third judicial district of the state of Utah, county of Salt Lake. The second count of the information was on motion dismissed by the court at the conclusion of the state’s evidence.

Omitting the formal parts of the information, the crime of forgery is charged as follows:

“That the said Mrs. M. Montag, alias Maurie Leek, on or about the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sturgis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. In Re Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Culpepper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. People v. JacobsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. State v. SheffieldUtah Supreme Court · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. FreemanUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State v. DunkleyUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State v. HartmanUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State v. PrettymanUtah Supreme Court · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API