Legal Opinion

St. Clair v. Kroger Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided October 14, 2008No. 3:07CV03798PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge.

This is a case arising under the Ohio Consumer Sales Practice Act [CSPA], O.R.C. § 1345, et seq., and the Uniform Commercial Code [UCC], as adopted in Ohio as O.R.C. § 1302, for fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of warranty, respectively. Plaintiff Wendy St. Clair alleges that Kroger Co., a national grocer headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, misled consumers by labeling beef products as “aged” when they in fact did not qualify for that designation.

Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d), as amended by the Class Action Fairness Act [CAFA]. 1 Pending…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Greene v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  2. In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  3. In re Myford Touch Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. McKinney v. Bayer Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  5. Allen v. Andersen Windows, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API