Legal Opinion

Sloan v. Hirsch

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1925No. Appeal, 59PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

Defendant is the owner of the Hirsch Building on Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, in which the elevator system consists of two cars moving side by side, with counterweights for each located in the back of the shaft. Dr. Gehrs, a tenant on the third floor, requiring the use of electricity, secured consent of defendant’s superintendent to place a conduit in the back part of the elevator shaft with wires therein by which the electric current could be transmitted from a generator in the basement. The superintendent suggested Sunday morning, April 8,1923, as a convenient…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Newingham v. J. C. Blair Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Pender v. RaggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Rink v. LowryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Craig v. Riter Conley Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Scalise v. F. M. Venzie Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Lopez v. GukenbackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Bruder v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Baxter v. Borough of HomesteadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Germansen v. EganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API